ironspiderson:

Hot take but sign language should be taught in schools as a language option and all cinemas should provide subtitles on all their movie screenings

absencesrepetees:

trouble every day (claire denis, 2001)

ohk4te:

holy golden hour? please have three angles of this gorgeous light as a ‘happy monday’ from me to you

thequeenofsunflowers:

💜✨✔️✨📄✨💡✨✉️✨☮️✨📞✨💡✨💻✨✔️✨💜

May I get all this fucking shit done ASAP, like yesterday – boom bitch let’s go

Likes charge,

Reblogs cast

shieldmaiden19:

catchymemes:

Anti anxiety.

As someone with crippling anxiety, this shit WORKS.

friendly-animals:

(Source)

(Source: instagram.com)

cinemove:

The Prince of Egypt (1998)

The 4 minute parting of the Red Sea sequence took 10 animators 2 years to complete. (x)

20aliens:

USA. 1985
Ferdinando Scianna

archivings:

Red or Dead Fall/Winter 1990

(Source: archivings)

(Source: imintheleaves)

sunbathe:

https://www.instagram.com/p/BezN0ZYlqJT/

owlire:

Dr. Azumi Fujita drinking from a mug that says “I can read your mind and you should be ashamed of yourself” is a big mood

prideprejudce:

tbh nothing frustrates me more then when people brush off classics like pride and prejudice or jane eyre because they don’t fit into today’s modern standards of feminism and social justice etc.

remember that these novels were published in the 19th century. and that some of the things that were written in these books may seem trivial to us today but would have absolutely fucking shook readers in the victorian era

like,,,,,elizabeth rejecting mr collins because she doesn’t love him even though it would have been considered her duty in her family to marry him? or jane eyre not agreeing to marry mr rochester unless it was on her own terms? hell even anne brontë wrote a lesser known novel about a wife leaving her abusive husband with her five year old son to live a better life?? do y’all realize how unheard of that would be in the 1800′s?? where women were considered more of a commodity than actual human beings??

even though they might not be up to todays standards of modern feminism and romance, they were still HUGE building blocks for equality for that time period. so if you’re a reader who says to themselves ‘I read classics with modern standards applied and I can’t get past that’ then you are most likely going to be disappointed when reading classics and not fully understand their significance to that time period 

setbabiesonfire:

This is what I’m here for

(Source: lamignonette)

mjalti:

mjalti:

why does using someone’s name in conversation feel so intimate, like the way a touch feels gentle as someone is fixing ur hair or brushing out a stray strand

someone: *uses my name to address me*

me: oh my God, i am a physical entity… …..